Saturday, 29 December 2012

Do we need antivirus for Android?

No need if you are careful not to install from untrustworthy source or dubious software.

http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/do-you-need-antivirus-on-android/

android security antivirus
We interview experts from Avast, Lookout, and AV-Test to determine if you really need to download antivirus and security apps for Android and how much danger your phone is in.
Android has been around for a few years now and yet the topic of security continues to be the source of some argument. On the one hand you have the argument that Android is not susceptible to virus threats and, provided you are careful about what you download, there is no real need for antivirus software. On the other, you have reports and statistics claiming that malware is frighteningly common and any Android device without protection is sure to get infected. So where does the truth lie? We’ve asked experts from three prominent companies in mobile security — AV-Test, Avast, and Lookout — to help us figure out just how much danger we’re in.

Antivirus is just part of the package

We already took a look at the top security apps on the Android platform and found that they tend to offer a lot more than just antivirus protection. In our security app roundup, we referred to a report by independent security experts, AV-Test, which compared the detection rates of the top Android antivirus apps. AV-Test CEO, Andreas Marx, said that antivirus is important, but a well-rounded security app is better.
“Antivirus is usually only one component of the offered Android protection packages,” said Marx. “So a stand-alone AV is not yet required at all times, but it is a good-to-have feature as part of a bigger package. Such packages often include easy-to-use backup features for user’s data, remote wipe in case the phone gets lost, etc.”
We also spoke to Jan Gahura, Director of Non-Windows products at Avast and he suggested that the real benefit of Avast! Mobile Security goes beyond the antivirus features. When asked about the biggest risk to Android users and the main incentive to download avast! Mobile Security he also concurred that viruses aren’t the biggest risk.
“I’d say that the biggest risk is that someone will get access to your device (either you lose your device or it’s stolen),” said Gahura. “That’s why we have focused on the best anti-theft solution currently available on the market. To have a smartphone in your pocket without a remote wipe possibility is a dangerous thing. It’s even more dangerous than losing keys to your house. Of course someone can steal your private data using a fraudulent application, but that’s certainly the harder way. With avast! Mobile Security, you are shielded from both threats.”

Malware, fact or fiction?

AV-TEST certifiedSo what about malware? Should we be worried? The key thing to remember about malware on Android is that you have to actually install it. Malware writers will use increasingly clever techniques to try and trick you into doing just that.
“If you only install software from trustworthy market places (like Google Play) and do not use your smartphone very often for web surfing or e-mailing, the OS is still pretty safe,” said Andreas Marx, AV-Test. “The majority of problems arise from the installation of ‘cracked’ applications from 3rd party market places which are often bundled with malicious software.”
As malware writers try to earn money for their bad deeds, they continually look for new ways to get their malicious software installed on your devices. The best recommendation is still to think twice before installing untrusted software or clicking on strange-looking links.
“The Google Play store is a relatively open environment,” said Jan Gahura, Avast. “Even after Google introduced its Bouncer (an automatic analysis tool to approve each application which is submitted to the Google Play Store) malicious applications still exist. Here at Avast we know how hard is to develop such a tool and how easy is to fool it from a bad guy’s perspective.”
That point of view is echoed by Derek Halliday, Senior Product Manager at Lookout, who had some lengthy remarks on mobile security. In his eyes, Android users are far from safe.
“No OS is completely safe, and protection is a requirement across mobile platforms. No matter where you find a critical mass of people, there will always be some bad guys looking for ways to exploit them. Android has exploded in popularity, attracting a lot of consumers in the last few years, so it’s only natural that it’s targeted.”
“It’s not actually a case of Android being particularly vulnerable – Google has taken some great steps toward protecting people and screens all apps entering Google Play – but the basic programming language is Java, and that’s what makes Android more of a target for the creators of malware. No special hardware is required – code can be written on a standard PC – so unlike iOS which requires a Mac, Android code writing is readily accessible to a lot of people across the world. This lower barrier to development attracts more bad guys.”
“In the last 12 months, there has been an increase in for-profit malware across all OSs. We’ve seen increasingly sophisticated threats emerging – for the first time ever, we witnessed malware writers targeting the mobile Web via compromised or infected websites with the NotCompatible threat.”

Is Google Play a hot bed of malware?

Google-toys-around-with-the-Android-Market,-changes-name-to-Google-PlayThe idea that malware-infected apps are proliferating in Google Play is popular and there is some statistical evidence to back it. At the recent NetEvents Americas a BT (British Telecom), security expert Jill Knesek suggested that up to a third of Android applications carried some form of malware (based on a test of 1,000 apps) and that most devices are compromised. It was widely reported, but not true. ZDNet questioned BT on the subject and it backpedaled, saying that it no longer wishes to talk about the subject. The claims have yet to be supported by any released report.
So is all this talk really just scaremongering designed to panic you into installing antivirus software? Chris DiBona, Open Source Programs Manager at Google, certainly thought so when he released an update tackling the topic on his Google+ account back in November, 2011. In it, he argued that: “Yes, virus companies are playing on your fears to try to sell you bs protection software for Android, RIM and iOS. They are charlatans and scammers. IF you work for a company selling virus protection for Android, RIM or iOS, you should be ashamed of yourself.”
He was talking about traditional virus problems of the kind you might see on Windows or Mac computers. Mobile platforms are not at risk in the same way because of the way they were designed. He makes a distinction between ‘viruses’ which spread themselves and bad apps containing malware, which you have to choose to install.

So what is Android malware?

The vast majority of malware on Android is focused on stealing your information, which is obviously a major concern. Perhaps the worst case scenario at the moment is malware that sends SMS messages to premium rate numbers. There’s no denying that it is dangerous but it’s also like a vampire – in that you have to invite it into your home, or onto your phone. It is not spreading by itself and, if you are sensible, you can avoid it without needing antivirus software.
Unfortunately, as we mentioned before, malware writers are employing ever more sophisticated techniques to fool you. There are apps that clone legitimate apps to fool you into downloading them and apps that are malware free when you first install them, but download malware through the update system.
“Currently, Premium SMS scams are the biggest threat to smartphone users, regardless of OS,” explained Derek Halliday, Lookout. ”They’re relatively simple to set-up, and have the potential to pay-off big. But there are constantly new threats evolving, ranging from aggressive ad networks, through to Trojans and new forms of malware. Mobile phones have become our wallet, contact list, communications, and more. You wouldn’t leave your bank account open to everyone, so why take the same chances with your phone when it contains so much information? But at the same time, you shouldn’t be scared of using all the features on your device – Lookout gives people the freedom to enjoy their smartphone to the full. ”

Pros and cons of security apps

Since many Android security apps combine anti-theft features with backup and antivirus, it won’t hurt to install them, but a pure antivirus solution might not be so worthwhile. In the future, antivirus on Android may move from a ‘good to have’ feature to a ‘must have’ component. It doesn’t sound like we’re at that point yet. Right now, it depends more on how careful you are.
If you’re wondering about the disadvantage of installing antivirus then it really boils down to three things –
  • cost (which you can avoid with a free option)
  • footprint (it will eat some processing power)
  • false positives (it will occasionally identify legitimate apps as malware)
Tomorrow, we’ll take a look at how to stay safe on Android without security apps. These are simple tips for people keen to avoid malware and not so keen on running antivirus software.

Details about Smarphone Rebate

Does not apply to me and my children. My 20 year old son got an Xperia Acro S so that he can read his textbooks. My secondary school children got Xperia Tipo so that they can learn about Android operating system.

We all should invest in smartphone technologies if we can afford it in order to give your children the competitive edge. It is no longer just a luxurious item.
 
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/12/28/nation/12511709&sec=nation

Friday December 28, 2012

RM200 rebate for smartphones worth not more than RM500 next year

By REGINA LEE
regina@thestar.com.my


PETALING JAYA: The Government's plan in giving out RM200 rebate for smartphones worth not more than RM500 next year is to convert non-smartphone users to bridge the digital divide.
The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) chairman Datuk Mohamed Sharil Mohamed Tarmizi said that the rebate is not targeted at those who want to buy expensive phones.
“We really want those with the old second generation mobile phones to migrate to a basic 3G smartphone.
“These are the people who generally want to buy a smartphone, but they cannot afford one,” he said.
He added that the rebate should also serve only those who aren't earning much, referring to the criteria that the rebate is only applicable for those earning less than RM3,000.
“If you can buy a RM2,000 smartphone, you're not the person we want to help. If you can afford this kind of phone, would you want a RM200 rebate?” he asked.
According to the Hand Phone Users Survey 2011 published by the MCMC, 89.6% handphone users polled earn less than RM3,000. At the same time, 87.3% handphone users surveyed are still using normal phones without smartphone capabilities.
The rebate is also only allowed for Malaysians between the ages of 21 and 30.
Sharil added that at last count, there are 20 smartphone models from seven manufacturers which cost not more than RM500 in retail price, with some of them being globally renowned brands.
When checked, Samsung also offers three smartphone models priced under RM500 including the popular Samsung Galaxy Y.
With the total allocation for the rebate placed at RM300mil, serving 1.5 million youths as announced by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak when tabling the 2013 budget, Sharil expected for the entire sum to be used.
He also said that there will be mechanisms put in place to ensure that people don't abuse the system, and those interested in the rebate should pre-register themselves on their website first at www.skmm.gov.my.

Successful update of Xperia Acro S

I had a nerve racking experience when I forgot how to switch on the phone.

Because it took so long to download the update, I left to watch astro shows. After a few hours, I checked the update status. Two hours ago, it mentioned that it will take 7 hours just to download. When I checked, it had finished updating without waiting for confirmation.

Luckily I still managed to see the instructions in order to complete the update. The instruction is very clear. Disconnect the phone from the PC. Switch on the phone but be prepared to wait. It warned not to take away the battery before the update is completed, which means before the phone is switched on again.

Unfortunately I forgot how long I had to press the on switch in order to really switch on the phone. I just pressed about 2 seconds, and stop when I see a green light. I did that twice without any response at all after a few minutes. I put the phone on its charging dock just to make sure that the battery will not run out. There are some response but the phone still does not appear to be switched on.

The trick was to press a long time until there is a vibration, not when the green light switches on. The technician was wrong. There is no need lose all the user data and apps. All are still intact as mentioned by the update notice. I shall inform the technican at the Sony repair centre about this. He was certainly wrong.

My Xperia Acro S phone is now successful updated to the latest system software xxxx.55 and PC Companion software verifies that it has the latest system update. Hopefully the next update will be for the Android Jellybean version.

Good Free APPS for Android as of 29 Dec 2012

Xplane 9 flight simulator. It used to cost US10 but make sure that you do not let your phone go to sleep.

Kingsoft Office.
http://www.redmondpie.com/the-best-office-suite-alternatives-for-android/

If you buy Xperia before 1/1/2013, you can register for Box in order to get 50Gbyte cloud storage for free.

I notice that Google store does not have a good rating for its apps. All are aproxiate numbers instead of exact numbers like Apple Store. And its name is changed from Marketplace to Store, trying to emulate Apple. The top apps are not convincing. They are of such low quality and insufficient categories to choose from.

Upgrading Sony Xperia Android 4.0.4 phones

After reading a number of problems with upgrading Xperia phones, especially Xperia Acro S, I tried to ask the Sony repair centre to upgrade this afternoon, 29 Dec 2012.

I was told that it will remove all apps and data files. My son's Xperia Tipo is not equipped with the Backup and Restore app so I cannot backup all the apps that we had downloaded. Downloading these apps took so much time.

The most difficult was to download the X-Plane 9 Apps, an apps that used to be sold for US10 but now is free. I failed to install in in my sons Samsung Galaxy S3. I tried a few times with  3 Xperia Acro S and an Xperia Tipo, all failed, or rather stucked for days downloading.

I finally managed to solve the problem by making sure that the display does not go to sleep. I made the settings in display to sleep only after 30 minutes. I also touch the screen once in a while to make the phones alife. It worked. It managed to download Xplan 9 in around 30 minutes. Xplane 9 for android should be around 100Mbyte in size.

With this confidence, I tried to upgrade my son's Xperia Tipo. I had initiated it last night but tried to stop it. When I tried to continue to update, it appeared that it had already downloaded it. I only need to install it. Making sure its battery it nearly full, I proceed with the backup. Also making sure that the sleep is set at 30 minutes, and constantly touching the screen. It worked.

The next step is to upgrade my wife's Xperia Acro. I had tried to initiate the upgrade using Sony's PC Companion, but it took too long. I searched the internet and just a few days earlier, someone reported that his Xperia Acro S bricked, a term used to describe a dead device. In his case, he left his phone overnight. That could be the reason. The phone could have gone to the sleep mode, aborting the upgrading process, which is dangerous for any device. You cannot abort an upgrade process. You must proceed to the end. Otherwise, you device will become demaged because the software is no longer working well because many components are missing.

I asked the AP supplier about the Xperia Acro S at Master Phone shop, centre point. Its price had dropped to RM1,100 from RM1,160 a few days ago. They also can upgrade firmware and Android for free when available. This means that the extra RM300 for Sony Malaysia Warranty is not really worth it. The extra items, headphone, NFC tags, microSD card, T shirt, are not really needed and I can buy better and cheaper somewhere else.

I don't see much difference in the quality of service of the MNSB, representing Sony Malaysia versus Master Phone Shop AP warranty. I sent for repairs to Master Phone shop service shop instead of to Sony representative and so far no problem at all. They can do it here locally at Kota Kinabalu, instead of having to send to KL for most repairs. Even to the point of verifying if Xperia Tipo is faulty or not.

To make matters worse, MNSB does not replace an item that is faulty even in the first day. Sony Malaysia can sell faulty items and yet refuse to replace them. This is an unprecedented poor service to the point of being illegal. When it comes to Sony Xperia phones, buy from AP suppliers. But not for PS3. The prices are the same, but AP suppliers do not provide any warranty at all.

Thursday, 27 December 2012

Sony Xperia buying experiences

I bought 5 xperia mobile phones all equipped with Android Ice Cream Sandwitch(ICS) version 4.0.4. 3 Xperia Acro S, 2 Xperia Tipo. I bought from Xperia shop, one of the branches by Chean and Yong Sdn. Bhd. They issue Sony Malaysia Warranty card but it is actually under MNSB, not the same as Sony Centres at Karamunsing and Centre Point ground floors. They like to call themselves as original Sony sets but there is little difference between them and AP warranty.

Some of the AP warranty is actually made by local repair shops at Kota Kinabalu. These local repair shops are actually good. My experiences had been with Master Phone shop at Centre point. Their repair shop can replace screens cheaply and easily. I recommend that you do not buy from this Chean and Yong shops because they will not replace a faulty new set. The reason given was that they have already registered the phone. I bought my Xperia Tipo and found it faulty at night so tried to get a replacement. My other Xperia Tipo is working well so we can tell clearly that this Tipo was faulty. Because this shop called Xperia refused to replace the set, I went to the repair centre. It is located at the let most block of Warisan Square, at the first floor.

They tried to reinstall the system software but it still didn't solve the problem. Initally I was told that it will take them 2 weeks before they can replace the set because they have to send it to KL. I don't accept this arrangement because it is not faulty when we use the phone. The phone was faulty when we bought it. It means that Sony has sold a faulty item. This is illegal and against the principle of justice. I called the Credit Card centre trying to stop payment and initiate a dispute but this CIMB credit card centre refuses to accept the dispute because the charge was actually made by me. I argued that despite the charge being made by me, the item was faulty so the shop is breaking the law for selling a faulty product. If the Credit Card centre cooperates with this illegal activity by releasing payment, it means that CIMB bank is also committing a crime. We may have agreed with all the disclaimers when we signed when we applied for the credit card but when the agreement is against the law, especialy the constitution, which guaranteed justice, the entire agreement is null and void. Unfortunately the recent judgements made by our Federal Court tend to side with written agreements despite them being contraray to the constitution. It even includes freedom of assembly cases so it is not clear if Malaysian courts will uphold the constitution or not.

 I was preparing to set up a consumer tribunal if they don't give me a reply by the day. Luckily the shop opens until 7.30 pm. If they don't give me a replacement by that day, I shall initiate a consumer tribunal against this shop for selling a faulty item. We can charge up to RM200 for expenses in carrying out the legal challenge. The claim for loss of use and other damages will add to the claims but it cannot be more than RM5000. The price of the Xperia Tipo Was only RM459. Sony is arrogant in defending a faulty product. Its service is worse than our 2 ringgit shops that allow replacements for faulty products within 3 days. Worse it is actually very common all over the world for the Xperia Tipo. It is caused by wrongly calibrated screen. The solution is just to recalibrate the screen with the software at http://mediafire.com/?4vm6ht4b3gibxl9.

 I have not tested this software because it is better to just go to the repair centre for them to do the update. It took a few hours to do it. Fortunately they managed to repair the phone by that day. Although I lost time and effort in getting the phone repaired, it is not worth to sue the shop. I won't buy from this Chean and Yong anymore. There are other shops that sell at similar prices. Even shops selling AP sets could be better or at worst the same as this shop. If you still want to buy from this shop because of the availability of the right set, make sure that you check everything first before you pay. We cannot even trust previously proven brands like Sony any more. I am not sure about Samsung. These Chean and Yong shops also sell Samsung sets.